Could Ronaldo to Manchester City work?



Try The Athletic for FREE for 30 days:

If the rumours are true Cristiano Ronaldo could be returning to Manchester, but this time in the sky blue of City. Ronaldo was once Pep Guardiola’s adversary when the two were in La Liga, but could they now be allies?

Seb Stafford-Bloor explains. Henry Cooke illustrates.

Follow Tifo Football:
Twitter:
Facebook:
Instagram:

Listen to the Tifo Football podcast:
The Athletic UK:
Apple Podcasts:
Spotify:

Watch more Tifo Football: Tactics Explained:
Finances & Laws:
Tifo Football Podcast:
Most Recent Videos:
1 Popular Videos:

About Tifo Football:
Tifo loves football. We create In-depth tactical, historical and geopolitical breakdowns of the beautiful game.

We know there’s an appetite for thoughtful, intelligent content. For stuff that makes the complicated simple.

We provide analysis on the Premier League, Champions League, La Liga, Serie A, Bundesliga, World Cup and more.

Our podcasts interview some of the game’s leading figures. And our editorial covers football with depth and insight.

Founded in 2017 and became a part of The Athletic in 2020. For business inquiries, reach out to tifo@theathletic.com.

Music sourced from epidemicsound.com
Additional footage sourced from freestockfootagearchive.com

#Ronaldo #MCFC #Transfers

Camisetas de fútbol baratas Tienda online, Comprar Camiseta futbol precio más barato y envío rápido. En nuestra tienda de camisetas de futbol baratas.

36 pensamientos sobre “Could Ronaldo to Manchester City work?

  1. I would hate for CR7 to go to City. But even If United actually signed him. I really don't see how he fits into our squad. It would only add to Bruno's workload in the press. And our wingers would also have to be more proactive in the press and not hold their shape. In short the players that already do a lot. Will have do that bit extra to compensate. Rashford, Bruno and Sancho would more likely be burnt out in half a season. And thats almost been the case last season even without CR7. So I really don't see it working out. My only hope is that PSG steals him away from City. Or Juventus convince him to stay.

  2. I would rather take Haaland. He would cost City 160 million euros for two season only and he surely won't play all league games at 37 yo, they could get any player in the world with this much money. This seriously don't make much sense apart from egos and branding.
    He is not cost efficient.

  3. This sound more like a desperate attempt by city, they didn't get kane, so they're going for Ronaldo now, kane made more sense as he had time at his side, but Ronaldo isn't at prime of his career(though his leaps at crosses and his goalscoring record would indicate otherwise), but kane would cost more than Ronaldo and Juventus needs fund so they're ready to sell Ronaldo while spurs don't wanna sell Kane. Get 1-2 year from Ronaldo(maybe they'll sign for 50 million and more) and then maybe buy kane or haaland(for more than 100 million). Money is never a problem at City, so they can sign whosoever is willing to join or in kane case whichever club is ready to sell their star player. But now I worry for juventus, they depend so much on Ronaldo, how will they cope up without him

  4. I think he’s a bigger need and better fit at Man U. But for a 37 Ronaldo he needs Pep. Which is why he should take a pay cut. Win a golden boot, a prem, a CL, and more with 2 seasons at City then go the MLS for 2 more then retire.

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *